Spatial Vector-Based Approach to the ERP Analysis as Applied to an EEG-based Discrimination of Traffic Light Signals

  • Sharmin Sultana Lamar University
  • Gleb Tcheslavski Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.
Keywords: EEG spatial vectors, Traffic light perception, VEP, Discrimination value, Modified knn classifier


The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of the spatial vector-based representation of multichannel electroencephalography (EEG; when each spatial vector denotes an “instantaneous” sample of cortical activation evolving over time) in the analysis of cortical responses to visual stimulation—as opposed to the traditional, temporal vector-based approach, when vectors are associated with distinct EEG channels. This representation was used in the analysis of EEG collected in the virtual traffic light environment with the attempt to determine the color of traffic light perceived by four participants. Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) analysis of variance was implemented for selected EEG electrodes. To utilize all available information, discrimination value was evaluated next for 32-dimensional EEG spatial vectors followed by modified “k nearest neighbors” (knn) classification. K-W test indicated that EEG samples at selected electrodes are different between different colors of traffic light and when observed for specific latencies. The average accuracy of a modified three-class knn classifier was approaching 60% (the random assignment would yield approximately 33%) for the specific poststimuli latencies. The proposed technique allows analyzing stimulation-synchronized cortical activity with the temporal resolution generally determined by the sampling rate of the neuroimaging modality. The discrimination value appears instrumental for predicting the clusterability of data assessed. Stimulation-evoked cortical responses are often of interest in studies of human cognition. The proposed technique may overcome the low signal-to-noise limitation of the traditional evoked response potential (ERP) analysis and possibly provide means to assess such responses under the real-time constraint.

Author Biography

Gleb Tcheslavski, Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.
Dr. Gleb Tcheslavski is an Associate Professor at Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.


Bayliss, J. D., & Ballard, D. H. (1998). The effects of eye tracking in a VR helmet on EEG recording. Technical Report 685, University of Rochester National Resource Laboratory for the Study of Brain and Behavior.

Bayliss, J. D., & Ballard, D. H. (2000). A virtual reality testbed for brain–computer interface research. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2), 188–190.

Clark, V. P., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(5), 387–402.

Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2000). Pattern Classification, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Wiley.

Heslenfeld, D. J., Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1997). Feature processing and attention in the human visual system: An overview. Biological Psychology, 45(1–3), 183–215.

Holcomb, P. J., & McPherson, W. B. (1994). Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain and Cognition, 24(2), 259–276.

Hoque, M. R. U., & Tcheslavski, G. V. (2018). Can electroencephalography improve road safety? An EEG-based study of driver's perception of traffic light signals in a virtual environment. International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 10(1), 78–86.

Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88(1), 51–63.

Khaliliardali, Z., Chavarriaga, R., Gheorghe, L. A., & Millán, J. d. R. (2012). Detection of anticipatory brain potentials during car driving. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 3829–3832.

Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Schilling, A., Tziridis, K., Traxdorf, M., Wollbrink, A., … Schulze, H. (2018). A statistical method for analyzing and comparing spatiotemporal cortical activation patterns. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 5433.

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205.

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.

Liang, S.-F., Lin, C.-T., Wu, R.-C., Huang, T.-Y., & Chao, W.-H. (2005). Classification of driver's cognitive responses from EEG analysis. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1, 156–159.

Lin, C.-T., Chung, I-F., Ko, L.-W., Chen, Y.-C., Liang, S.-F., & Duann, J.-R. (2007). EEG-based assessment of driver cognitive responses in a dynamic virtual-reality driving environment. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(7), 1349–1352.

Lin, C.-T., Lin, K.-L., Ko, L.-W., Liang, S.-F., Kuo, B.-C., & Chung, I.-F. (2008). Nonparametric single-trial EEG feature extraction and classification of driver’s cognitive responses. EURASIP Journal of Advances in Signal Processing, 2008, 849040.

Ludwig, K. A., Miriani, R. M., Langhals, N. B., Joseph, M. D., Anderson, D. J., & Kipke, D. R. (2009). Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(3), 1679–1689.

Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., & Luck, S. J. (1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 219–243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mourino, J., del R. Millan, J., Cincotti, F., Chiappa, S., Jane, R., & Babiloni, F. (2001). Spatial filtering in the training process of the brain domputer interface. 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), 639–642.

Phyu, T. N. (2009, March). Survey of Classification Techniques in Data Mining. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol I. IMECS 2009, Hong Kong.

Rutiku, R., Aru, J., & Bachmann, T. (2016). General markers of conscious visual perception and their timing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 23.

Sherlin, L. H., Arns, M., Lubar, J., Heinrich, H., Kerson, C., Strehl, U., & Sterman, M. B. (2011). Neurofeedback and basic learning theory: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Neurotherapy, 15(4), 292–304.

Strehl, U., Aggensteiner, P., Wachtlin, D., Brandeis, D., Albrecht, B., Arana, M., ... Holtmann, M. (2017). Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a multicenter randomized trial controlling for unspecific effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 135.

Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.

Van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biological Psychology 85(1), 134–142.

Walsh, P., Kane, N., & Butler, S. (2005). The clinical role of evoked potentials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76(Suppl. 2), ii16–ii22.

Wang, H., & Zhang, N. (2010, June). The analysis on vehicle color evoked EEG based on ERP method. Poster presented at the. 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Chengdu, China.

Yeh, Y.-Y., Lee, D.-S., & Ko, Y.-H. (2013). Color combination and exposure time on legibility and EEG response of icon presented on visual display terminal. Displays, 34(1), 33–38.

Yigal, A., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Interactions between working memory and visual perception: An ERP/EEG study. NeuroImage, 36(3), 933–942.

Research Papers