Spatial Vector-Based Approach to the ERP Analysis as Applied to an EEG-based Discrimination of Traffic Light Signals

Authors

  • Sharmin Sultana Lamar University
  • Gleb Tcheslavski Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.6.4.170

Keywords:

EEG spatial vectors, Traffic light perception, VEP, Discrimination value, Modified knn classifier

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of the spatial vector-based representation of multichannel electroencephalography (EEG; when each spatial vector denotes an “instantaneous” sample of cortical activation evolving over time) in the analysis of cortical responses to visual stimulation—as opposed to the traditional, temporal vector-based approach, when vectors are associated with distinct EEG channels. This representation was used in the analysis of EEG collected in the virtual traffic light environment with the attempt to determine the color of traffic light perceived by four participants. Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) analysis of variance was implemented for selected EEG electrodes. To utilize all available information, discrimination value was evaluated next for 32-dimensional EEG spatial vectors followed by modified “k nearest neighbors” (knn) classification. K-W test indicated that EEG samples at selected electrodes are different between different colors of traffic light and when observed for specific latencies. The average accuracy of a modified three-class knn classifier was approaching 60% (the random assignment would yield approximately 33%) for the specific poststimuli latencies. The proposed technique allows analyzing stimulation-synchronized cortical activity with the temporal resolution generally determined by the sampling rate of the neuroimaging modality. The discrimination value appears instrumental for predicting the clusterability of data assessed. Stimulation-evoked cortical responses are often of interest in studies of human cognition. The proposed technique may overcome the low signal-to-noise limitation of the traditional evoked response potential (ERP) analysis and possibly provide means to assess such responses under the real-time constraint.

Author Biography

Gleb Tcheslavski, Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.

Dr. Gleb Tcheslavski is an Associate Professor at Phillip M. Drayer Department of Electrical Engineering, Lamar University.

References

Bayliss, J. D., & Ballard, D. H. (1998). The effects of eye tracking in a VR helmet on EEG recording. Technical Report 685, University of Rochester National Resource Laboratory for the Study of Brain and Behavior.

Bayliss, J. D., & Ballard, D. H. (2000). A virtual reality testbed for brain–computer interface research. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847811

Clark, V. P., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(5), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.387

Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2000). Pattern Classification, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Wiley.

Heslenfeld, D. J., Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1997). Feature processing and attention in the human visual system: An overview. Biological Psychology, 45(1–3), 183–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05228-3

Holcomb, P. J., & McPherson, W. B. (1994). Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain and Cognition, 24(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1994.1014

Hoque, M. R. U., & Tcheslavski, G. V. (2018). Can electroencephalography improve road safety? An EEG-based study of driver's perception of traffic light signals in a virtual environment. International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 10(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVS.2018.093062

Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90028-N

Khaliliardali, Z., Chavarriaga, R., Gheorghe, L. A., & Millán, J. d. R. (2012). Detection of anticipatory brain potentials during car driving. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 3829–3832. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346802

Krauss, P., Metzner, C., Schilling, A., Tziridis, K., Traxdorf, M., Wollbrink, A., … Schulze, H. (2018). A statistical method for analyzing and comparing spatiotemporal cortical activation patterns. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 5433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23765-w

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0

Liang, S.-F., Lin, C.-T., Wu, R.-C., Huang, T.-Y., & Chao, W.-H. (2005). Classification of driver's cognitive responses from EEG analysis. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1, 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1464548

Lin, C.-T., Chung, I-F., Ko, L.-W., Chen, Y.-C., Liang, S.-F., & Duann, J.-R. (2007). EEG-based assessment of driver cognitive responses in a dynamic virtual-reality driving environment. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(7), 1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.891164

Lin, C.-T., Lin, K.-L., Ko, L.-W., Liang, S.-F., Kuo, B.-C., & Chung, I.-F. (2008). Nonparametric single-trial EEG feature extraction and classification of driver’s cognitive responses. EURASIP Journal of Advances in Signal Processing, 2008, 849040. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/849040

Ludwig, K. A., Miriani, R. M., Langhals, N. B., Joseph, M. D., Anderson, D. J., & Kipke, D. R. (2009). Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(3), 1679–1689. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90989.2008

Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., & Luck, S. J. (1993). Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV (pp. 219–243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mourino, J., del R. Millan, J., Cincotti, F., Chiappa, S., Jane, R., & Babiloni, F. (2001). Spatial filtering in the training process of the brain domputer interface. 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), 639–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019016

Phyu, T. N. (2009, March). Survey of Classification Techniques in Data Mining. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Vol I. IMECS 2009, Hong Kong.

Rutiku, R., Aru, J., & Bachmann, T. (2016). General markers of conscious visual perception and their timing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00023

Sherlin, L. H., Arns, M., Lubar, J., Heinrich, H., Kerson, C., Strehl, U., & Sterman, M. B. (2011). Neurofeedback and basic learning theory: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Neurotherapy, 15(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10874208.2011.623089

Strehl, U., Aggensteiner, P., Wachtlin, D., Brandeis, D., Albrecht, B., Arana, M., ... Holtmann, M. (2017). Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a multicenter randomized trial controlling for unspecific effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00135

Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/381520a0

Van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The N400-concreteness effect reflects the retrieval of semantic information during the preparation of meaningful actions. Biological Psychology 85(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.06.004

Walsh, P., Kane, N., & Butler, S. (2005). The clinical role of evoked potentials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76(Suppl. 2), ii16–ii22. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.068130

Wang, H., & Zhang, N. (2010, June). The analysis on vehicle color evoked EEG based on ERP method. Poster presented at the. 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Chengdu, China.

Yeh, Y.-Y., Lee, D.-S., & Ko, Y.-H. (2013). Color combination and exposure time on legibility and EEG response of icon presented on visual display terminal. Displays, 34(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.11.007

Yigal, A., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Interactions between working memory and visual perception: An ERP/EEG study. NeuroImage, 36(3), 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.014

Downloads

Published

2019-12-11

Issue

Section

Research Papers