Language rehabilitation of TBI patient by Loreta Z score Neurofeedback
Traumatic brain injury (TBI), by vehicle accident creates a variety of sequelae that can be very challenging for clinicians to develop rehabilitation interventions. This case report presents an example of language rehabilitation with Loreta Z score Neurofeedback (LZNFB) for a patient suffering from TBI. The treatment protocol included 15 sessions of LZNFB, focusing on language network. Before and after the treatment, QEEG/LORETA analysis as well as neurocognitive assessments were acquired and analyzed. Our analysis showed remarked improved language performance by LZNFB. We concluded that this method can be valid in treatment of language deficit in TBI patient. We also found that rehabilitation of language network, raised the performance of working memory and attention on this TBI patient. Therefore, language could not be separated from other cognitive performance. Rather it effects on other cognitive performances and affected by them.
Ardila, A., Bernal, B., & Rosselli, M. (2016). How localized are language brain areas? A review of Brodmann areas involvement in oral language. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(1), 112-122.
Banks, M. E. (2007). Overlooked but critical: Traumatic brain injury as a consequence of interpersonal violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 290-298.
Barlow, D. H., Andrasik, F., & Hersen, M. (2007). Single case experimental designs: Allyn and Bacon London.
Barth, J. T., Macciocchi, S. N., Giordani, B., Rimel, R., Jane, J. A., & Boll, T. J. (1983). Neuropsychological sequelae of minor head injury. Neurosurgery, 13(5), 529-533.
Bazanova, O. M., Auer, T., & Sapina, E. A. (2018). On the efficiency of individualized theta/beta ratio neurofeedback combined with forehead EMG training in ADHD children. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 12, 3.
Brown, J., Clark, D., & Pooley, A. E. (2019). Exploring the use of neurofeedback therapy in mitigating symptoms of traumatic brain injury in survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(6), 764-783.
Cheon, E.-J., Koo, B.-H., & Choi, J.-H. (2016). The efficacy of neurofeedback in patients with major depressive disorder: an open labeled prospective study. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 41(1), 103-110.
Emmorey, K., Giezen, M. R., Petrich, J. A., Spurgeon, E., & Farnady, L. O. G. (2017). The relation between working memory and language comprehension in signers and speakers. Acta psychologica, 177, 69-77.
Faridi, A., Taremian, F., Thatcher, R. W., Dadashi, M., & Moloodi, R. Comparison of LORETA Z score Neurofeedback and Cognitive Rehabilitation in terms of their Effectiveness in reducing Craving in Opioid Addicts. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 0-0.
Fitz, H., Uhlmann, M., Van den Broek, D., Duarte, R., Hagoort, P., & Petersson, K. M. (2020). Neuronal spike-rate adaptation supports working memory in language processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(34), 20881-20889.
Galassi, A., Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2020). Attention in Natural Language Processing. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
Hanten, G., Dennis, M., Zhang, L., Barnes, M., Roberson, G., Archibald, J., . . . Levin, H. S. (2004). Childhood head injury and metacognitive processes in language and memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(1-2), 85-106.
Hayashi, Y. (2019). Investigating effects of working memory training on foreign language development. The Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 665-685.
Ishkhanyan, B., Boye, K., & Mogensen, J. (2019). The meeting point: Where language production and working memory share resources. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 48(1), 61-79.
Jackson, H., Philp, E., Nuttall, R. L., & Diller, L. (2002). Traumatic brain injury: A hidden consequence for battered women. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(1), 39.
Kluetsch, R. C., Ros, T., Théberge, J., Frewen, P. A., Calhoun, V. D., Schmahl, C., . . . Lanius, R. A. (2014). Plastic modulation of PTSD resting‐state networks and subjective wellbeing by EEG neurofeedback. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 130(2), 123-136.
Koberda, J. (2015). LORETA Z-score neurofeedback-effectiveness in rehabilitation of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology and Neurobiology, 1(4), 1-9.
Koberda, J., & Frey, L. (2015). Z-score LORETA neurofeedback as a potential therapy for patients with seizures and refractory epilepsy. Neurol Neurobiol, Volume1, 1.
Koberda, J. L. (2015). Z-score LORETA neurofeedback as a potential therapy in depression/anxiety and cognitive dysfunction. In Z Score Neurofeedback (pp. 93-113): Elsevier.
Koberda, J. L. (2020). QEEG as a Useful Tool for the Evaluation of Early Cognitive Changes in Dementia and Traumatic Brain Injury. Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 1550059420914816.
Koberda, J. L., Koberda, P., Bienkiewicz, A. A., Moses, A., & Koberda, L. (2013). Pain management using 19-electrode Z-score LORETA neurofeedback. Journal of Neurotherapy, 17(3), 179-190.
Koberda, J. L., Koberda, P., Moses, A., Winslow, J., Bienkiewicz, A., & Koberda, L. (2014). Z-score LORETA neurofeedback as a potential therapy for ADHD. Biofeedback, 42(2), 74-81.
Lucas Koberda, J., & Stodolska-Koberda, U. (2014). Z-score LORETA neurofeedback as a potential rehabilitation modality in patients with CVA. J Neurol Stroke, 1(5), 00029.
McCreery, R. W., Spratford, M., Kirby, B., & Brennan, M. (2017). Individual differences in language and working memory affect children’s speech recognition in noise. International journal of audiology, 56(5), 306-315.
Peach, R. K., Nathan, M. R., & Beck, K. M. (2017). Language-specific attention treatment for aphasia: Description and preliminary findings. Paper presented at the Seminars in speech and language.
Surmeli, T., Eralp, E., Mustafazade, I., Kos, H., Özer, G. E., & Surmeli, O. H. (2016). Quantitative EEG Neurometric Analysis–Guided Neurofeedback Treatment in Dementia: 20 Cases. How Neurometric Analysis Is Important for the Treatment of Dementia and as a Biomarker? Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 47(2), 118-133.
Thatcher, R. W. (2010). LORETA Z score biofeedback. Neuroconnections, December, 9-13.
Thatcher, R. W., & Lubar, J. F. (2014). Z score neurofeedback: Clinical applications: Academic Press.
Vig, J., Madani, A., Varshney, L. R., Xiong, C., Socher, R., & Rajani, N. F. (2020). Bertology meets biology: Interpreting attention in protein language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15222.
Villard, S., & Kiran, S. (2017). To what extent does attention underlie language in aphasia? Aphasiology, 31(10), 1226-1245.
Wang, P., Wu, Q., Cao, J., Shen, C., Gao, L., & Hengel, A. v. d. (2019). Neighbourhood watch: Referring expression comprehension via language-guided graph attention networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
Wong, J. Y.-H., Fong, D. Y.-T., Lai, V., & Tiwari, A. (2014). Bridging intimate partner violence and the human brain: a literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(1), 22-33.
Zhang, H., Li, H., Li, R., Xu, G., & Li, Z. (2019). Therapeutic effect of gradual attention training on language function in patients with post-stroke aphasia: a pilot study. Clinical rehabilitation, 33(11), 1767-1774.
Copyright (c) 2021 Farnaz Faridi, Hayat Ameri, Masoud Nosratabadi, Seyed Majid Akhavan Hejazi, Robert Thatcher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).