The Impact of Invalidating Family Environments and Emotional Dysregulation on Mentalization Abilities: A Study of Electrodermal Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.12.4.279Keywords:
Mentalization, Emotional Dysregulation, Invalidating Family Environment, Electrodermal ActivityAbstract
Mentalization, the ability to understand and interpret mental states, is central to successful social interactions. Impairments in mentalization, manifesting as either hypomentalization or hypermentalization, are often linked to challenges in empathy, executive functioning, and relationships. Although such deficits are frequently associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD), studying them in nonclinical populations provides valuable insight into the mechanisms of emotional regulation and social cognition. This study explores the relationship between mentalization, emotional dysregulation, and childhood invalidation in a nonclinical sample under stress. Twenty participants completed stress-induction tasks, including the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) and the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test (MMST), while electrodermal activity (EDA) and self-reported emotional arousal (SAM) were recorded. Results revealed significant correlations between better MASC performance and increased physiological activation, as well as between invalidating family environments and emotional dysregulation. Notably, maternal invalidation was strongly linked to heightened emotional dysregulation, while a validating family environment was associated with hypermentalization tendencies. These findings suggest that early family dynamics, particularly invalidation, play a critical role in mentalization impairments and emotional regulation. The study underscores the importance of addressing childhood environmental factors to foster healthy emotional and cognitive development.
References
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Carlson, N. R., & Birkett, M. A. (2014). Fisiología de la conducta. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Carpenter, R. W., & Trull, T. J. (2013). Components of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder: A review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(1), Article 335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0335-2
Chapman, A. L. (2019). Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation. Development and Psychopathology, 31(3), 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419000658
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cuve, H. C. J., Harper, J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2023). Coherence and divergence in autonomic‐subjective affective space. Psychophysiology, 60(6), Article e14262. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14262
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Dziobek, I., Fleck, S., Kalbe, E., Rogers, K., Hassenstab, J., Brand, M., Kessler, J., Woike, J. K., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2006). Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0107-0
Ferreira, S. O. (2019). Activación emocional en sujetos humanos: Procedimientos para la inducción experimental de estrés. Psicologia USP, 30. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e20180176
Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. W. (2007). Mentalizing and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Mental Health, 16(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230601182045
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
Hervás, G., & Jódar, R. (2008). Adaptación al castellano de la Escala de Dificultades en la Regulación Emocional [The Spanish version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale]. Clínica y Salud, 19(2), 139–156.
Idesis, Y., Shlezinger, N., & Eldar, Y. C. (2018, July). Analog-to-digital converter-based serial links: An overview. In 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Conventional and Microwaves in Radar, Telecommunications and Related Fields (CWTM) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
Jara-Ettinger, J. (2019). Theory of mind as inverse reinforcement learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 29, 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.04.010
Keng, S.-L., & Wong, Y. Y. (2017). Association among self-compassion, childhood invalidation, and borderline personality disorder symptomatology in a Singaporean sample. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4, Article 224. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs40479-017-0075-3
Kolotylova, T., Koschke, M., Bär, K.-J., Ebner-Priemer, U., Kleindienst, N., Bohus, M., & Schmahl, C. (2010). Development of the “Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test” (MMST). Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 60(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1103297
Lahera, G., Boada, L., Pousa, E., Mirapeix, I., Morón-Nozaleda, G., Marinas, L., Gisbert, L., Pamiàs, M., & Parellada, M. (2014). Movie for the assessment of social cognition (MASC): Spanish validation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(8), 1886–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2061-6
Lejuez, C. W., Kahler, C. W., & Brown, R. A. (2003). A modified computer version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) as a laboratory-based stressor. The Behavior Therapist, 26, 290–292.
Li, E. T., Carracher, E., & Bird, T. (2020). Linking childhood emotional abuse and adult depressive symptoms: The role of mentalizing incapacity. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99, Article 104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104253
Linehan, M. M., & Kehrer, C. A. (1993). Borderline personality disorder. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (2nd ed., pp. 396–441). The Guilford Press.
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
Luyten, P., Fonagy, P., Lowyck, B., & Vermote, R. (2012). Assessment of mentalization. In A. W. Bateman & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice (pp. 43–65). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Makowski, D., Pham, T., Lau, Z. J., Brammer, J. C., Lespinasse, F., Pham, H., Schölzel, C., & Annabel Chen, S. H. (2021). NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y
Mountford, V., Corstorphine, E., Tomlinson, S., & Waller, G. (2007). Development of a measure to assess invalidating childhood environments in the eating disorders. Eating Behaviors, 8(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.01.003
Musser, N., Zalewski, M., Stepp, S., & Lewis, J. (2018). A systematic review of negative parenting practices predicting borderline personality disorder: Are we measuring biosocial theory's ‘invalidating environment’? Clinical Psychology Review, 65, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.003
Németh, N., Matrai, P., Hegyi, P., Czeh, B., Czopf, L., Hussain, A., Pammer, J., Szabó, I., Solymár, M., Kiss, L., Hartmann, P., Szilágyi, Á. L., Kiss, Z., & Simon, M. (2018). Theory of mind disturbances in borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 270, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.049
Perner, J., & Lang, B. (2000). Theory of mind and executive function: Is there a developmental relationship? In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 150–181). Oxford University Press.
Pineda-Alhucema, W. F. (2017). Sobre la valoración de la Teoría de la Mente. Psicogente, 20(38), 218–219. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.20.38.2571
Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1995). Origins of human social competence. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 205–218). The MIT Press.
Pruessner, M., Pruessner, J. C., Hellhammer, D. H., Pike, G. B., & Lupien, S. J. (2007). The associations among hippocampal volume, cortisol reactivity, and memory performance in healthy young men. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 155(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.12.007
Puddington, M. M., Wright, E., & Gagliesi, P. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis of the invalidating Childhood Environment Scale in Spanish (ICES). Universitas Psychologica, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy19.cfai
Repacholi, B. M. (1998). Infants' use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person's emotional expression. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.1017
Salsman, N. L., & Linehan, M. M. (2012). An investigation of the relationships among negative affect, difficulties in emotion regulation, and features of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(2), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9275-8
Sandi, C. (2013). Stress and cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1222
Schwarzer, N.-H., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., & Gingelmaier, S. (2022). Self-rated mentalizing mediates the relationship between stress and coping in a non-clinical sample. Psychological Reports, 125(2), 742–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294121994846
Sharp, C. (2014). The social-cognitive basis of BPD: A theory of hypermentalizing. In C. Sharp & J. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of borderline personality disorder in children and adolescents (pp. 211–228). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_15
Sharp, C., Ha, C., Carbone, C., Kim, S., Perry, K., Williams, L., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Hypermentalizing in adolescent inpatients: Treatment effects and association with borderline traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.1.3
Sharp, C., Pane, H., Ha, C., Venta, A., Patel, A. B., Sturek, J., & Fonagy, P. (2011). Theory of mind and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents with borderline traits. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(6), 563–573.E1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.01.017
Sharp, C., & Sieswerda, S. (2013). The social-cognitive basis of borderline and antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.1.1
Sharp, C., & Vanwoerden, S. (2015). Hypermentalizing in borderline personality disorder: A model and data. Journal of Infant, Child & Adolescent Psychotherapy, 14(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2015.1004890
Vahidi, E., Ghanbari, S., & Behzadpoor, S. (2021). The relationship between mentalization and borderline personality features in adolescents: Mediating role of emotion regulation. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 26(1), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2021.1931376
Villarrubia, M. D., Zoé Natera, M., & Milet, C. (2023). Bienestar psicológico, malestar psicológico y estado emocional en estudiantes universitarios según su nivel de actividad física. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 26(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v26i1.24733
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Victoria Papagna Maldonado, Lorenzo Raggi, Jerónimo Rodríguez Cuello, Marcos Parra, Borja Parga, Javier Fotti, Federico José Sánchez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).







