Characterization of Steady-State EEG Responses to Familiar and Unfamiliar Music While Playing a Virtual Reality Rhythm Game
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.13.1.43Keywords:
EEG, Electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands, Virtual Reality, music familiarity, rhythm gameAbstract
Previous studies have shown that the brain processes familiar and unfamiliar music differently, yet there is a lack of EEG analysis focusing on active rhythm tasks during music listening. Our study aims to address this gap by investigating EEG responses to familiar and unfamiliar music while participants engage in a rhythm game within a virtual reality environment. We utilized a commercially available four-electrode headband to collect EEG data from 10 healthy subjects during experiments. Participants played the rhythm game Beat Saber, using virtual sabers to match the beat of the music. This experiment employed a matched pair design, with each subject serving as their own control in EEG comparisons. EEG data were categorized into delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands, and power within each band was analyzed to discern patterns across trials. Our findings revealed significant differences in how the brain processed familiar versus unfamiliar music across both audio-only and virtual reality settings. These changes occurred predominantly on the right side of the brain, suggesting hemispheric specialization in music processing. Overall, our study contributes new insights into neural dynamics underlying music perception during active engagement, highlighting distinct EEG responses to familiar and unfamiliar music across sensory contexts.
References
Abhang, P. A., Gawali, B. W., & Mehrotra, S. C. (2016). Introduction to EEG- and speech-based emotion recognition. Academic Press.
Beat Saber. (2018). Beat Saber – VR rhythm game [video game]. Beat Games. https://beatsaber.com/
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755
Freitas, C., Manzato, E., Burini, A., Taylor, M. J., Lerch, J. P., & Anagnostou, E. (2018). Neural correlates of familiarity in music listening: A systematic review and a neuroimaging meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, Article 686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00686
Hailstone, J. C., Omar, R., & Warren, J. D. (2009). Relatively preserved knowledge of music in semantic dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 80(7), 808–809. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.153130
Hampel. (n.d.). Filter outliers using Hampel identifier – Simulink. MathWorks. https://www.mathworks.com/help/dsp/ref/hampelfilter.html
Herweg, N. A., Solomon, E. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2020). Theta oscillations in human memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.006
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
Jagiello, R., Pomper, U., Yoneya, M., Zhao, S., & Chait, M. (2019). Rapid brain responses to familiar vs. unfamiliar music – An EEG and pupillometry study. Scientific Reports, 9, Article 15570. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51759-9
Klostermann, E. C., Loui, P., & Shimamura, A. P. (2009). Activation of right parietal cortex during memory retrieval of nonlinguistic auditory stimuli. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.9.3.242
Kumagai, Y., Arvaneh, M., & Tanaka, T. (2017). Familiarity affects entrainment of EEG in music listening. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00384
Kumar, J. S., & Bhuvaneswari, P. (2012). Analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) signals and its categorization—A study. Procedia Engineering, 38, 2525–2536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.298
Malekmohammadi, A., Ehrlich, S. K., Rauschecker, J. P., & Cheng, G. (2023). Listening to familiar music induces continuous inhibition of alpha and low-beta power. Journal of Neurophysiology, 129(6), 1344–1358. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00269.2022
Malik, A. S., & Amin, H. U. (2017). Designing EEG experiments for studying the brain: Design code and example datasets. Elsevier.
Mansi, S. A., Pigliautile, I., Porcaro, C., Pisello, A. L., & Arnesano, M. (2021). Application of wearable EEG sensors for indoor thermal comfort measurements. ACTA IMEKO, 10(4), 214. https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.1180
Matlab. (n.d.). MathWorks. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
Muse. (2023, March 29). The brain sensing headband store with worldwide shipping: Muse™ EEG-powered meditation & sleep headband. Muse. https://choosemuse.com/
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005). Brain organization for music processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225
Rakel, D., & Faass, N. (2006). Complementary medicine in clinical practice: Integrative practice in American healthcare. Jones and Bartlett.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xander Boit, Dr. Peixoto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).





