Neurological Diagnosis in the AI Era: A Comparative Assessment of ChatGPT 3.5, Google Gemini, Being AI, and Perplexity AI

Authors

  • Syed Muhammad Essa Bolan Medical Complex, Hospital, Quetta
  • Abdelrhman Hassan Mohammed Faculty of Medicine, Luxor University, Luxor, Egypt
  • Zainullah Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
  • Milica Jovanovic University of Tartu, Estonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.13.1.54

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Neurological Diagnosis, Large Language Models (LLMs), Comparative Evaluation, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

Background. In neurological diagnostics, where complexity, data volume, and diagnostic urgency present major obstacles, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the potential to revolutionize the field. Despite widespread use, there is a lack of comparable performance assessments of publicly available AI tools for integrated clinical reasoning in neurology. Methods. This cross-sectional study evaluated five AI platforms (ChatGPT 3.5, Google Gemini, Bing AI, Perplexity AI, DeepSeek) utilizing 15 standardized neurological cases from Case Files: Neurology, Third Edition. Each platform was given identical prompts imitating clinical consultations. Responses were evaluated (maximum 6 points per case; total 90) in three domains: diagnosis, subsequent diagnostic step, and therapeutic/molecular foundation. Nonparametric statistical methods (Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square) assessed performance disparities. Results. ChatGPT achieved the highest overall score (88/90, 97.8%), followed by DeepSeek (86/90, 95.6%), Perplexity (84/90, 93.3%), Google Gemini (78/90, 86.7%), and Microsoft Copilot (73/90, 81.1%). Therapeutic accuracy was 100% for ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini, whereas it was 80% for Copilot. Although there were disparities in performance, inferential statistics revealed no significant differences between platforms (Kruskal-Wallis p = .423; Chi-square p = .374). Verbosity showed significant variation: DeepSeek averaged 488 words per response, whereas Copilot and Perplexity averaged 239 to 240 words. Conclusion. Popular AI platforms (ChatGPT, DeepSeek) exhibit significant proficiency in neurological diagnosis and treatment planning, but there is a huge difference in the depth and structure of responses across all of the tools. AI should be used as complementary healthcare assistance, with future integration requiring better explainability and real-world validation.

References

AbuAlrob, M. A., & Mesraoua, B. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological emergencies: A comprehensive review of recent advances and future directions. Frontiers in Neurology, 15, Article 1485799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1485799

Alhejaily, A.-M. G. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Biomedical Reports, 22(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3892 /br.2024.1889

Alyami, M. S. M., Alyami, M. M. M., Al Khuraim, H. A. M., Alsalem, A. M. S., Alrayshan, H. A. M., Albakri, K. A. M., Alsaqran, Q. N., Alyami, H. S., Alzamanan, A. S., Alharbi, F. M., & Alharbi, F. M. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence across medical clinics: strengthening collaborative efforts for improved patient outcomes. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 2691–2698. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4668

Dipankar, P., Salazar, D., Dennard, E., Mohiyuddin, S., & Nguyen, Q. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence based advancements in nanomedicine for brain disorder management: An updated narrative review. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, Article 1599340. https://doi.org/10.3389 /fmed.2025.1599340

Kalani, M., & Anjankar, A. (2024). Revolutionizing neurology: The role of artificial intelligence in advancing diagnosis and treatment. Cureus, 16(6), Article e61706. https://doi.org /10.7759/cureus.61706

Kandel, A. (2025). Addressing neurological inequities in developing countries: Challenges and strategic solutions. Sarvodaya International Journal of Medicine, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/SIJM.SIJM_2_24

Kaur, S., Singla, J., Nkenyereye, L., Jha, S., Prashar, D., Joshi, G. P., El-Sappagh, S., Islam, M. S., & Islam, S. M. R. (2020). Medical diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms: Principles and perspectives. IEEE Access, 8, 228049–228069. https://doi.org/10.1109 /ACCESS.2020.3042273

Li, X., Zhang, L., Yang, J., & Teng, F. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence in medical image analysis: A review of current trends and future directions. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 44(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00863-x

Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024). Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review. Heliyon, 10(4), Article e26297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297

Mota, A. L., Ferraciolli, S. F., Ayres, A. S., Polsin, L. L. M., da Costa Leite, C., & Kitamura, F. (2023). AI and big data for intelligent health: Promise and potential. In H. Sakly, K. Yeom, S. Halabi, M. Said, J. Seekins, & M. Tagina (Eds.), Trends of artificial intelligence and big data for e-health (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11199-0_1

Nguyen, T. V., & Vo, N. (2024). Using traditional design methods to enhance AI-driven decision making: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0639-0

Onciul, R., Tataru, C.-I., Dumitru, A. V., Crivoi, C., Serban, M., Covache-Busuioc, R.-A., Radoi, M. P., & Toader, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence and neuroscience: Transformative synergies in brain research and clinical applications. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(2), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390 /jcm14020550

Oyeniyi, J., & Oluwaseyi, P. (2024). Emerging trends in AI-powered medical imaging: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science, Technology & Engineering, 13(4), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.55948/IJERSTE.2024.0412

Rahman, M. H., Hossan, K. M. R., Uddin, M. K. S., & Hossain, M. D. (2024). Improving collaborative interactions between humans and artificial intelligence to achieve optimal patient outcomes in the healthcare industry. SSRN, Article 5029975. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5029975

Rashid, M., & Sharma, M. (2025). AI‐assisted diagnosis and treatment planning—A discussion of how AI can assist healthcare professionals in making more accurate diagnoses and treatment plans for diseases. In R. Singh, A. Gehlot, N. Rathour, & S. V. Akram (Eds.), AI in disease detection: Advancements and applications (pp. 313–336). Wiley-IEEE Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394278695.ch14

Rudie, J. D., Rauschecker, A. M., Bryan, R. N., Davatzikos, C., & Mohan, S. (2019). Emerging applications of artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology. Radiology, 290(3), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181928

Sahu, M., Gupta, R., Ambasta, R. K., & Kumar, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision medicine: A paradigm shift in big data analysis. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, 190(1), 57–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2022.03.002

Salammagari, A. R. R., & Srivastava, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Revolutionizing disease diagnosis and treatment planning. International Journal of Research in Computer Applications and Information Technology, 7(1), 41–53.

Segato, A., Marzullo, A., Calimeri, F., & De Momi, E. (2020). Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review. APL Bioengineering, 4(4), Article 041503. https://doi.org /10.1063/5.0011697

Shen, J., Zhang, C. J., Jiang, B., Chen, J., Song, J., Liu, Z., He, Z., Wong, S. Y., Fang, P.-H., & Ming, W.-K. (2019). Artificial intelligence versus clinicians in disease diagnosis: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7(3), Article e10010. https://doi.org/10.2196/10010

Shokran, M., Islam, M. S., & Ferdousi, J. (2025). Harnessing AI adoption in the workforce a pathway to sustainable competitive advantage through intelligent decision-making and skill transformation. American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 8(3), 954–976. https://globalresearchnetwork.us/index.php/ajebm/article/view/3355

Surianarayanan, C., Lawrence, J. J., Chelliah, P. R., Prakash, E., & Hewage, C. (2023). Convergence of artificial intelligence and neuroscience towards the diagnosis of neurological disorders—A scoping review. Sensors, 23(6), 3062. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063062

Toy, E. C., Simpson, E. P., Mancias, P., Furr Stimming, E. E. (2018). Case Files: Neurology, Third Edition. McGraw Hill.

Tyagi, Y., & Sharma, P. K. (2021). Artificial intelligence: An emerging approach in healthcare. In Artificial intelligence (pp. 71–92). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.3389 /fdgth.2025.1644041

Valerio, J. E., Aguirre Vera, G. d. J., Fernandez Gomez, M. P., Zumaeta, J., & Alvarez-Pinzon, A. M. (2025). AI-driven advances in Parkinson’s disease neurosurgery: Enhancing patient selection, trial efficiency, and therapeutic outcomes. Brain Sciences, 15(5), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390 /brainsci15050494

World Health Organization. (2023). WHO framework for meaningful engagement of people living with noncommunicable diseases, and mental health and neurological conditions. World Health Organization.

Yang, R., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., Zhao, Y., & Jin, X. (2025). Burden of neurological diseases in Asia, from 1990 to 2021 and its predicted level to 2045: A global burden of disease study. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 706. https://doi.org /10.1186/s12889-025-21928-9

Zeb, S., Nizamullah, F., Abbasi, N., & Fahad, M. (2024). AI in healthcare: Revolutionizing diagnosis and therapy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 3(3), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijmdsa.v3i3.4546

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Research Papers