Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregulation Practice: Ethical Principles, Risk Stratification, and a Clinical Policy Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.13.3.280Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Neuroregulation, Neurofeedback, ethics, automation bias, clinical policy, data privacyAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are entering neuroregulation practice through multiple simultaneous pathways, including automated qEEG analysis, protocol recommendation systems, AI-assisted documentation, and consumer-facing mental health applications that clients bring directly into the therapeutic relationship. No ethics code specific to neuroregulation has yet addressed these applications directly. This article presents a conceptual and practical ethical framework grounded in established codes, including the BCIA Code of Ethics, ISNR Code of Ethics, APA Ethical Principles, ACA Code of Ethics, and the APA (2025) Ethical Guidance for Artificial Intelligence. A risk continuum model organizing AI applications along three dimensions (opacity, clinical consequence, and distance from oversight) is proposed. Four ethical domains are addressed: informed consent and transparency, practitioner competence and scope, data privacy and vendor accountability, and three AI accuracy risks (hallucination, automation bias, and collusion). A five-element practice policy framework is presented in tabular form for direct clinical use. Existing ethics principles are sufficient to guide responsible AI integration when applied deliberately. The practitioner remains accountable for AI-assisted decisions regardless of tool design or vendor claims. Proactive policy development positions neuroregulation clinicians to shape the field's emerging standards.
References
American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/ethics/2014-aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
American Psychological Association. (2025). Ethical guidance for artificial intelligence in the professional practice of health service psychology. https://www.apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/ethical-guidance-ai-professional-practice
Anthropic. (2026). Claude [Large language model]. https://claude.ai/
Biofeedback Certification International Alliance. (n.d.). BCIA code of ethics. https://www.bcia.org/bcia-professional-standards-ethical-principles
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., & Bitterman, D. (2021). The need to separate the wheat from the chaff in medical informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 153, Article 104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104510
Cheng, M., Lee, C., Khadpe, P., Yu, S., Han, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2026). Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence. Science, 391(6792), Article eaec8352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec8352
Cummings, M. L. (2017). Automation bias in intelligent time critical decision support systems. In D. Harris (Ed.), Decision making in aviation (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095080-17
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).
Horvitz, E., & West, R. (2026). A narrowing window to understand AI. Science, 392(6802), Article 1003. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aei3167
International Society for Neuroregulation and Research. (n.d.). ISNR code of ethics and standards of practice. https://isnr.org/interested-professionals/isnr-code-of-ethics
McBain, R. K., Cantor, J. H., Breslau, J., Diliberti, M., Zhang, L. A., Zhang, F., Burnett, A., Kofner, A., Rader, B., Pataranutaporn, P., Stein, B. D., Mehrotra, A., & Yu, H. (2026). AI chatbot use and disclosure for mental health among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatrics, 180(8), 884–890. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2015
Nagata, J. M., Memon, Z., Huang, O., & Moreno, M. A. (2026). Adolescent health and generative AI: Risks and benefits. JAMA Pediatrics, 180(1), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.4502
Natali, C., Marconi, L., Dias Duran, L. D., & Cabitza, F. (2025). AI-induced deskilling in medicine: A mixed-method review and research agenda for healthcare and beyond. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(11), Article 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11352-1
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), Article 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Sherlin, L. H., & Longo, R. (2025). Clarifying the code: Historical foundations, current practices, and ethical billing in neurofeedback and qEEG. NeuroRegulation, 12(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.12.2.138
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K., & Burdick, M. D. (1999). Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(5), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1999.0252
Tahseen, H. (2026). When AI colludes: Clinical reliability of training and preference data as a trustworthy-AI criterion. JMIR Mental Health, 13, Article e96894. https://doi.org/10.2196/96894
Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., & Malone, T. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(12), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leslie Sherlin, Robert Longo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
